Back in December 2014 the BBC News website published a backgrounder titled “What is jihadism?” which included the following section:
In other words, audiences can apparently conclude that when the BBC uses the term ‘jihadist’ it is telling them that the group described as such uses violence and that when the term ‘Islamist’ is employed, they can understand that those described in that way are non-violent.
With that in mind, it is interesting to see how an article published on January 26th under the headline “Syria war: Rebels unite after attack by Idlib jihadists” describes differing factions in Syria. [all emphasis added]
“Insurgent factions in Syria have joined together to fight off an assault by a powerful jihadist group which launched an attack on rebels this week.
Several militias formed an alliance with key Islamist group Ahrar al-Sham amid some of the worst inter-factional clashes…
View original post 540 more words